Showing posts with label Philippa Jane Keyworth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philippa Jane Keyworth. Show all posts

Friday, October 21, 2022

‘Cheek by jowl’—the Royal Academy’s Exhibition, 1776

by Philippa Jane Keyworth 

When one thinks of an art exhibition these days, one might imagine an enormous white space, interspersed here and there with paintings. Carefully crafted. Minimalist. 

Not so in the 18th century. 

The Royal Academy of Arts annual exhibition
 
For my recent novel, I decided to set a scene at the Royal Academy of Art’s annual exhibition. The Royal Academy of Arts (often known in the present day as the RA), was founded in 1768. Sir William Chambers, an architect, brought a petition signed by 36 artists before King George III to seek permission to ‘establish a society for promoting the Arts of Design’. When the sovereign granted it, the RA and its annual exhibition was born, the latter known today as the Summer Exhibition. 

William Hunter's Life Class
for the Royal Academy of Art

Who could submit work? 

"[an] Annual Exhibition of Paintings, Sculptures and Designs, which shall be open to all Artists of distinguished merit."  


The Summer Exhibition remains one of the oldest open submission exhibitions in the world. This means you need no artistic pedigree in order to submit a piece for exhibit. It was a great egalitarian experiment in the vein of 18th century Enlightenment thinking that carries on to this day. 

‘...it’s a democracy of a sort, a very arbitrary one, I’m in charge!’ - Grayson Perry jokes in a Google culture and arts article 

Who could attend? 

And the visitors to the annual exhibition in the late 18th century were not all aristocracy either. Anyone could pay the shilling admission fee and admire the latest creations from the leading artists of the day. 

The academicians had to charge something, or—according to them—they might have to suffer the, 

‘noxious effluvia of the vulgar herd’ 

Perhaps now you can see why I might think this a fascinating setting? One in which I could base a scene filled with drama and intrigue in 1776? Just imagine it, the plethora of paintings staring down at the great swathes of artists, nobility and the middling orders gazing up. The sound and the buzz… 

What did it look like? 

So, back to the task at hand, I had decided to set a scene at the exhibition. Now I had to find out where it was held, what it looked like, which paintings were there in 1776. As any modern-dayer worth their salt would do, I began searching for contemporary images of the exhibition. Visual sources can be one of the most accessible ways to explore the past. I’m such a fan of it that I based my undergraduate dissertation on such sources, pouring over prints, paintings and etchings for many hours. And now I needed to find images of the exhibition. 

You read that right—by the way—I wanted to find ‘artwork of artwork’. And when I did, well, that was when I realised that the RA’s exhibition in 1776 was the furthest thing from a minimalist affair.

 Richard Earlom
The Exhibition at the Royal Academy
in Pall Mall in 1771, 20 May 1772. Mezzotint. 

Check out the RA’s reading of this print as each figure/painting/decoration has meaning. 

Paintings at the exhibition were hung cheek-by-jowl from dado rail to ceiling. It would have been an overwhelming sight upon first entry, and one which would have taken visitors some time to absorb.

To save wall space, pictures were hung frame-by-frame from chair rail to ceiling. The higher canvases, sometimes more than five tiers overhead, were tilted forward to enhance visibility and reduce glare. The huge, sky-lit galleries reverberated with the noise of the thronging crowds who, as usual at social occasions in Georgian England, brought their hunting hounds and lap dogs. - ‘Britain's Royal Academy of Art in the Late 1700s and Early 1800s’

 If you were an artist whose work was accepted for display, it would then have been arranged by the academicians (members who ran the RA), meaning you could be a new artist displayed alongside established names. That’s still the case today. 

Artists coveted the ‘on-the-line’ spots, where you would have your work seen to advantage at around or just above eye level. Anything higher than that was… not great. 

I mean, it’s just a case of logistics. 

Who would be able to see it? So undesirable was the happenstance, that a term was coined especially for it: ‘skied’. No artist wished to be ‘skied’. That was not only an insult, it was bad for business. For the exhibition could make an artist, as it wasn’t just to display work, it was to sell it! 

So here we are, standing in a room with walls mounted to the ceiling with paintings, and it wasn’t just the one room. The first location of the Royal Academy’s annual exhibition was a set of auctioneer’s rooms in Pall Mall. The visitor would have progressed through them, within a great swell of people, pouring into the main chamber where the principle works were hung.

Two Hunters, 'Prophet' and 'Surprise'
John Boultbee


How would you know who had created what? 

Visitors would have been given a catalogue of the works on display—gratis—to carry around with them. I was delighted to find the original catalogue of the 1776 exhibition digitised here.

 
Queen Eleanor Sucking the Blood 
from King Edward's Arm
Coloured stipple etching by Wynne Ryland, 1780
after A. Kauffman



It was a glorious find for a historian like me. I was able to read about the pieces of art on display, and then look them up on Google. This led me to featuring several in my book including works by Boultbee, Cosway and Kauffman. The latter is a particular favourite of mine. Angelica Kauffman was one of the founding members of the Royal Academy and a celebrated painter of the day. It’s always pleasing to read about an independently successful woman from the past.

Madonna and Child
Richard Cosway

What does it have to do with my novel? 

So there it is, a wonderful historical backdrop in which to set a scene. The great cross-section of Society, oozing through the rooms, jostling one another, speaking, pointing, exclaiming. Oh yes, a very good backdrop, one in which the heroine of a Georgian romance might set about uncovering Societal secrets. And a backdrop where the hero might just wish to find out what she’s up to… 

 References: 

  1. William Hunter's life class for the Royal Academy of Art at old Somerset House. Mezzotint, 1783, after J. Zoffany
  2. 250 Years of the Summer Exhibition, Arts and Culture, Google
  3. Richard Earlom, The Exhibition at the Royal Academy in Pall Mall in 1771, 20 May 1772. Mezzotint
  4. How to read it: The Exhibition of the Royal Academy in Pall Mall, 1771
  5. Britain's Royal Academy of Art in the Late 1700s and Early 1800s
  6. Two Hunters: 'Prophet' and 'Surprise', John Boultbee (1753–1812)
  7. The exhibition of the Royal Academy, MDCCLXXVI. (1776). The eighth., 1776
  8. Queen Eleanor sucking the poison from King Edward's arm. Coloured stipple etching by Wynne Ryland, 1780, after A. Kauffman.
  9. Madonna and Child, Richard Cosway (1742-1821)
  10. Difficult Beginning ? The Early Years of the RoyalAcademy of Arts in London, Isabelle Baudino
  11. Wellcome Collection
  12. About the Exhibition, Royal Academy


~~~~~

Philippa Jane Keyworth

Philippa Jane Keyworth, also known as P. J. Keyworth, writes historical romance and fantasy novels you'll want to escape into. Keyworth's historical romance novels include Regency and Georgian romances that trace the steps of indomitable heroes and heroines through historic British streets. From London's glittering ballrooms to its dark gaming hells, characters experience the hopes and joys of love while avoiding a coil or too! Travel with them through London, Bath, Cornwall and beyond and you'll find yourself falling in love.

 


Monday, July 8, 2013

Giveaway of The Widow's Redeemer, by Philippa Jane Keyworth

This week's giveaway is a paperback copy of The Widow's Redeemer, by Philippa Jane Keyworth (open internationally). Go HERE to learn more about the book.

To enter, please leave a comment on this post with your contact information so that we can contact the winner.

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Class Distinctions in Regency England


By Philippa Jane Keyworth

I want to thank English Historical Fiction Authors for having me here. It is a real privilege to guest post, and I want to thank them for giving me the opportunity.

Today I want to write about a well-known primary source, The Mirror of Graces by a Lady of Distinction. This book was first published in London in 1811, and, presumably due to its popularity, it was subsequently re-printed in New York in 1813 and 1815, in Edinburgh in 1830 and then again in Boston in 1831.

The copy that I own is an enlarged photo-reprint and spans some 239 pages or more. At such a length, I can hardly say that this article will cover the entirety of the book or will be a full analysis of the source. However, I wanted to share a little something about this captivating text which I am currently studying.

Specifically, I have been drawn to the passage entitled, 'ON THE PECULIARITIES OF DRESS, WITH REFERENCE TO THE STATION OF THE WEARER'. It strikes me that when reading a Regency romance and even when writing one, we tend to focus on the positives of class divides. Who can resist a classic Pride and Prejudice-esque storyline that follows the romantic attachment of a man and woman divided by class who eventually overcome it?

What we sometimes fail to see is, as John Tosh describes it, 'The gulf between past and present.' We don't give complete gravity to the social divides of the time and instead we romanticize them. In truth, while reading this passage from The Mirror of Graces, I wasn't sure whether to laugh or to frown in comprehension. The peculiarities of dress A Lady of Distinction refers to are the fashions of the time, and she sets us straight from the beginning by describing the danger of lower and middle classes dressing fashionably:
It is not from a proud wish to confine elegance to persons of quality that I contend for less extravagant habits in the middle and lower orders of people: it is a conviction of the evil which their vanity produces that impels me to condemn in toto the present levelling and expensive mode.
And before this statement of her conviction she declares the propriety of corresponding your dress with not only your season of life, character and figure but also with your station. She speaks of this matter so:
This is the subject not less of moral concern than it is a matter of taste.
Yes, that's right, you've got it. She believes that dressing for your station is not just about taste but actually your moral obligation. Well, doesn't this just put a new spin on the classical fashions of the Regency!?

She differentiates between tradesmen and those with 'fortunes of princes'. Of course, for those with 'fortunes of princes' it is different. They are allowed to array their 'fair partners' in 'rich produce', but not so for the tradesmen:
...but I animadvert on our retail shopkeepers, our linen drapers, upholsterers, &c. who, not content with gold and silver baubles, trick out their dames in jewels!
Shocking! She even uses an exclamation mark! 

And what, pray tell, does she think of the morality of these tradesman she so heartily attacks for their expensive tastes?
No wonder that these men load their consciences with dishonest profits, or make their last appearance in the newspaper as insolvent or felo de se! 
Incompetent both in business and morals. Just wait until she gets onto the working-class women....
If the brazier's daughter is taught to sing, dance and play like the heiress to an earldom, we must not be surprised that she will also emulate the decorations of her rival...not able to have hers of gems, foil-stones produce a similar affect....
So, these women are like those of today who shop in Primark to emulate the fashions of Chanel and D & G. Is this successful in attracting men (which is one of the purposes of such finery) ?
...and when she is thus arrayed, she plays away the wanton and the fool, till some libertine of fortune buys her either for a wife or a mistress.
Harsh words!

So, having devoted four pages to these working-class tradesmen and women, a Lady of Distinction moves swiftly, and unsurprisingly, back to the class she is from:
After having drawn this agreeable picture of her who has well-chosen, I will leave this modern daughter of industry to her discreet and virtuous simplicity; and once more turn to her whose fortune and station render greater changes and expence in apparel not only admissible but commendable.
I found this passage, as I have said, quite humorous, but it was also very enlightening. There is a lot to be learned here, I believe. 

The author is, as she describes herself, '...a woman of virtue and a Christian...' who does not feel it beneath her dignity to lift her pen on these subjects, so I will therefore assume her to be from the upper echelons of society. It's important to count this information when making any deductions from what has been said above. 

What I will deduce from the above extracts is:

The importance of dress to some women in Regency Society
The industrial revolution allowing for the rise of rich tradesmen (note the term she uses, 'this modern daughter of industry')
The ability of the middle and lower classes to buy finer clothing
Tradesmen becoming bad businessmen when they buy fine clothing for their female relatives - oh, I love this woman's logic!
The availability of ‘mimmick’ clothing, jewels etc
Dress being a clear factor denoting status
The status line being questioned and blurred by trade and affluence
The 'truth' that tradesmen's daughters dressing above their station leads to wantonness and becoming a libertine's wife or mistress
Following the fashions and spending money on fashion for women 'of fortune' is commendable

Again, I want to stress that this is a tiny section of this text which I have analysed and there are far more diverse subjects within it which should not be discounted. However, it does provide a valuable window through a contemporary text into opinions advocated by one woman, at least, and embraced by more, most probably, as evidenced by the multiple re-printings of this book.

It is an interesting text, especially as it is written almost twenty years after Mary Wollstonecraft's controversial text A Vindication of the Rights of Woman which declares the need for women to receive an equal education for men, whereas the Mirror of Graces implies the opposite. To gain some insight into the differing views on women and their roles between the years 1792 and 1811, I would highly recommend reading these two contemporary texts. They could not be more different, and yet both contain insights into the mindset of women toward other women and toward their role within society itself. 

Which mindset was more prevalent? It would have been amazingly helpful if the rest of the women in British Regency England had written a volume cataloging their responses to the views put forth in these two texts—if only!

Thank you again for having me, and I hope you enjoyed this little research topic of mine!
_____________________________


Known to her friends as Pip, Philippa Jane Keyworth has been writing since she was twelve in every notebook she could find. Add to this her love for reading, history, and horse-riding, and you have the perfect recipe for creating Regency romances. You can find out more about Philippa by going to her blog, checking out her Facebook page, or following her on Twitter.


Pip’s debut novel, The Widow’s Redeemer (Madison Street Publishing, 2012), brings to life the romance between a young widow with an indomitable spirit and a wealthy viscount with an unsavory reputation. It is this week's giveaway on EHFA and you can click here to read more about it and enter to win.



Sunday, December 23, 2012

The Widow's Redeemer, by Philippa Jane Keyworth

Merry Christmas week to you all! This week you have the chance to win The Widow's Redeemer, a sweet Regency romance by Philippa Jane Keyworth. This giveaway is for one paperback copy available internationally. You can read more about the book HERE.

If you wish to be entered into the drawing, please leave a comment below including your e-mail address.