Judith Arnopp
Most people would agree that England’s most memorable monarch is
Henry VIII. The bloody years of his reign, the executions, the break with Rome,
his complex sex life have all left their mark on our imagination. He is so
synonymous with England that you might even assume that a magnificent memorial
stands prominently in Westminster such as the one his parents share, or the
superb edifice that enshrines the resting place of his daughter Elizabeth. But
you’d be quite wrong to think so.
Indeed, although buried at Windsor alongside his third wife, Jane
Seymour, there is no glorious shrine, no guilded angels, just a slab set in the
floor. Where once people trembled before King Henry, now many of us do not even
notice when we walk over him.
Death is a great leveller.
In the sixteenth century monuments were intended to mark wealth, status
and power, and the building of them was usually undertaken during the lifetime
of the person for whom the tomb was intended. Always conscious of the need to
emphasise his own supremacy, Henry laid down elaborate plans for a suitable
edifice. You have only to consider the most famous portrait of Henry to imagine the impact he intended his memorial to have.
Henry was dominant, self-obsessed and power hungry. His
burial tomb was intended to reflect that.
The Tomb of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York |
As early as 1518, while still married to his first queen, Katherine of
Aragon, a contract was signed by a Florentine sculptor, Pietro Torrigiano, the
same man who created the fabulous tomb of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. It
was to be similar in design, of black and white marble yet twenty-five per cent
bigger and ‘finished in beauty, fairness, costs and adornments.’
Unfortunately, an issue arose over payment between the sculptor and
Wolsey (who was in charge of the project) and the Florentine left without
completing, or perhaps not even beginning the work.
Henry and Wolsey quickly sought other craftsmen and made further plans
for even more splendid designs. Robert Hutchinson in his book, The
last days of Henry VIII notes that the design was based on one
originally intended for Pope Leo X. ‘It was to be 28ft high, 15ft long and
topped by an effigy of the king on horseback in grand Italian Renaissance style.
Beneath this the high canopy were to lie the effigies of the king and queen. In
its sheer megalomaniac scale, it was deliberately intended to be a monument to
outshine that of any pope or monarch found within the churches and abbeys of
Europe.’ Wow, splendid indeed ...and expensive.
The Tomb of Henry's Grandmother, Margaret Beaufort |
At around this time Cardinal Wolsey had also began plans for his own
shrine. As equally status-conscious as his king, Wolsey’s tomb was to outdo
that of Henry VII’s both in ostentation and in cost. Unfortunately, his downfall
preceded the completion of his monument and having fallen foul of his King, he
was instead buried ignominiously at Abbey Park in Leicestershire.
Henry, never one to let a good thing go to waste, lost no time in
acquiring elements of Wolsey’s tomb for his own use, and Cromwell, who was now the
project manager, made several payments to Italian and English metal founders. A
giant effigy of the king was produced in gilt
bronze and work continued until the last decade of Henry’s reign when war with
France and Scotland put pressure on the royal coffers. By this time the project was well
underway. In his will Henry stated that his tomb was 'well onward and almost made therefore already with a fair grate
about it, in which we will also the bones of our true and loving wife Queen
Jane be put also.’
But with the king out of the picture the project for his grand burial was no longer of primary importance, even to his children.
But with the king out of the picture the project for his grand burial was no longer of primary importance, even to his children.
Under his successor, Edward VI, work continued half-heartedly
and under the new protestant regime even the chantry priests who had been asked
to pray for Henry and Jane’s souls were forbidden to continue. The King's tomb
was shelved and after Edward’s early demise in 1553 work on his own tomb took
precedence over Henry’s.
When Mary Tudor assumed the throne she declined to continue with the work
for fear she should be seen as supporting one who broke with Rome, and when Elizabeth's turn came, she showed no more filial respect than her sister.
Records show that she did consider continuing with the project but rejected
several designs, hampered no doubt by the reluctance to spend too much money on
it. After all, her own considerable monument, taking many years to complete and
requiring a fortune in white marble, was of more immediate importance.
The Tomb of King Francis I of France |
Through the Commonwealth and the Restoration periods the half-finished
monument, and the chapel that housed it, fell into further disrepair, its
ruinous condition being recorded as late as 1749. In 1804 when the
architect, James Wyatt, began work on a huge royal catacomb on the site of the
chapel, Henry’s tomb was put into storage. As his memory faded into
the past, plans for Henry VIII’s memorial faded with it. The tomb was never completed
and the huge black sarcophagus intended for
Henry, is now in St Paul’s housing instead the bones of England’s hero of
Trafalgar, Lord Nelson - who has so many monuments.
And so Henry and Jane stayed where they were, beneath the floor of St
George’s Chapel at Windsor but they were not left in peace. In 1649
the tomb was opened up to make way for Charles I. One wonders, after executing
so many lesser men, what Henry makes of sharing his tomb with a defeated and
executed King. You can almost hear his indignant roar, ‘It wouldn’t have
happened in my day.’
At the end of the seventeenth century the tomb was opened again for the
burial of a still-born child of Princess George of Denmark (later to become Queen Anne)
and again to allow a casket of relics appertaining to Charles I to be
interred.
At that time a light was lowered into the tomb and revealed Henry’s
coffin to be ‘in a condition of great dilapidation. The King’s skull, with its
very broad frontal, his thigh bones, ribs and other portions of the skeleton
are exposed to view as the lead has been extensively ripped open…’
The grave remained unmarked until 1837 when in King William IV’s reign
it was inscribed as follows.
IN A VAULT
BENEATH THIS MARBLE SLAB
ARE DEPOSITED THE
REMAINS
OF
JANE SEYMOUR, QUEEN OF
KING HENRY VIII
1537
KING HENRY VIII
1547
KING CHARLES I
1648
AND AN INFANT CHILD
OF QUEEN ANNE.
THIS MEMORIAL WAS
PLACED HERE
BY COMMAND OF
KING WILLIAM IV.
1837.
So, our great Tudor monarch lies in a modest tomb, in mixed company
while many of his contemporaries, people who bowed and scraped before him, lie
in splendour elsewhere in the kingdom.
The graves of his wives are more resplendent than his, even those who
died disgraced. Katherine of Aragon has a black marble grave marker with her
name written above it in large gilded letters. Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard
lie beneath decorative grave markers at the Chapel of St Peter ad vincula
at the Tower of London where flowers are left regularly by modern day
sympathisers.
Anne of Cleves has a marked tomb at Westminster Abbey which, if a little
difficult to find, still has substance. And at Sudeley
Castle an effigy of Henry’s last wife, Catherine Parr, lies upon a resplendent
tomb.
Henry's son, Edward VI has a tomb fit for a monarch at Westminster
Abbey, as does Elizabeth who shares her grave with her half-sister Queen Mary
I. Even Henry’s bastard son, Henry Fitzroy, lies in some majesty in St
Michael’s church at Framlingham in Suffolk.
Many of Henry's VIII's contemporaries have superior monuments to their
king. Thomas Howard, Earl of Surrey, third Duke of Norfolk has a sumptuous
memorial at Framlingham Church, and Henry’s great rival King Francis I has
a huge effigy in the Basilica of St Denis in Paris with a separate, gigantic
urn to house his heart.
The Tomb of Henry's last victim, Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey |
And Henry’s last victim, Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, who was beheaded
just one day before the king died, has a resplendent effigy marking the tomb he
shares with his wife Frances, at Framlingham in Suffolk.
Henry’s elder brother Arthur, who was Catherine of Aragon's first
husband and died before he could ascend the throne, has an ostentatious tomb in
a designated chapel. I could go on, and on but I will resist.
Henry’s parents, grandparents, wives, children, cousins, siblings,
friends; most of the Tudors rest in splendour and, I hope, peace.
It is only Henry, who in life was the most ostentatious of them all, that lacks the majesty of a proper monument.
Judith writes historical novels and essays. Her latest Tudor novel The Winchester
Goose, is now available in paperback and on kindle. Click the link to purchase.
The Winchester Goose
More information about Judith's work can be found on her webpage: http://www.juditharnopp.com
The Winchester Goose
More information about Judith's work can be found on her webpage: http://www.juditharnopp.com
Sic transit gloria mundi
ReplyDeleteInteresting article. In spite of Henry's location, I found it quite fascinating to walk on top of the man's grave when I last visited England. It's almost a surprise when you stand on top and look underneath your feet at the inscription. Of importance, too, about Elizabeth sharing a grave with Mary, she possesses a prominent burial that is quite obvious, while Mary is buried directly underneath her. You'd never know it, unless you pay attention to the tour. Writing historical fiction becomes so much more alive when you're able to travel to the places you read about. The ghosts of the past greet you, and your imagination takes off. In my opinion, at least!
ReplyDeleteone day i hope to visit all the graves and leave flowers ,it would be an honor to say a prayer for them all for they should never be forgotten, they are a part of history i keep in my heart,xoxo
ReplyDelete