by Katherine Pym
Per Violet Barbour, author
of Henry Bennet, earl of Arlington, (published
1914), “The ministers of Charles II were not chosen for their
honesty…”
King Charles II |
This did not make Charles
II a stupid man, but one who had gone through years of hardship. His life had
often been imperiled. Men conspired
against him, or tried to rule him. It
left its mark. To watch for underhanded
dealings during his reign, he sought out men who would meet toe-to-toe those who threatened the king, and his court.
On one hand Charles II
filled his court with frivolity. He played, danced, and allowed his spaniel dogs to
soil the palace. He and his brother, the Duke of York, loved the theatre, and
supported their own troupes. Charles II
allowed women on stage.
On the other hand, Charles
II inherited a land filled with restless and bitter malcontents whose
very existence shattered at the fall of the Commonwealth. Rarely opening up to anyone, he did not trust
easily. He expected attempts on his life, or efforts to overthrow his
monarchy.
John Thurloe |
During the
Cromwell days, John Thurloe was the head of espionage. As Secretary of State
under Cromwell, he sent out spies to cull out plots from within the
Protectorate’s government. His spy network was extensive. He employed men – and
women – who were, on the surface, stalwart royalists. His spies could be
located in every English county, overseas, i.e., in Charles II’s exiled court,
in the Americas, and the far Indies.
Samuel Morland |
Thurloe compiled lists, sent spies into enemy camps, had men tortured and killed. One such fellow, Samuel Morland, and assistant to Thurloe under Cromwell, confessed to witness a man ‘trepanned to death’ at Thurloe’s word. (Dictionary.com states the following definition to trepan: “a tool for cutting shallow holes by removing a core.”) Not a nice way to go.
Thurloe orchestrated the Sir Richard Willis Plot, wherein the king and duke would be lured out of exile to the Sussex coast. Once the brothers disembarked, they would be instantly murdered. Thankfully, we know this plot failed.
Commonwealth spies
infiltrated homes, churches, and businesses to destroy the royalist enemy, and under
Charles II’s, his government did the same.
Their goal was to destroy nonconformists, or “fanaticks”. Depending who
was in power, plots were a part of political life.
After the
Restoration, Thurloe was dismissed, but not executed for crimes against the
monarchy (Charles I and II). He was let go for exchange of valuable
Commonwealth government documents.
During the king’s
exile, Sir Edward Nicholas held the position of Secretary of State, but he was
old, nearly age 70. Within two years of the Restoration, Charles II replaced him
with Sir Henry Bennet, who took charge of the Crown’s espionage. October 15,
1662, he was appointed Secretary of State.
Joseph Williamson |
Joseph Williamson worked
for Bennet as the undersecretary. Williamson
was born for this work. He took the bull by the horns and enhanced the
processes Thurloe had begun. Williamson
built a brilliant spy network. He enlisted informers who, for money, turned on their associates. He burrowed spies into households, businesses,
and churches. He used grocers, doctors
and surgeons, anyone who would inform him of persons against
the king. He had men overseas watching for any plots. Informants
were everywhere.
His tools were
numerous. He loved ciphers, and cipher
keys. Doctor John Wallis was an expert in this who worked under Thurloe and
Bennet. The man could crack a code in nothing flat. Williamson, known as Mr. Lee in the
underworld, used London's Grand Letter Office for ciphered messages to pass back and
forth between the undersecretary’s office and his informants and spies. He expected to be kept apprised by ciphered letters at the end of each day, passed
through the post office.
Williamson obtained
ambassador letters, had them opened and searched for underhanded deceit. He
developed a system of local informers. Letters and money crossed palms. Under Thurloe, the secret service received £800 per year. Under Bennet, the money
doubled. Most of the annual budget was spent on spies and keeping them alive.
For more reading
on spies and espionage under the reign of King Charles II, please see Of Carrion Feathers, set in London 1662.
Death by trepanning? Hadn't come across that one before in our annals. As historical deaths go, it has to rank as one of the most unpleasant!
ReplyDeleteI have the shivers every time I think of it...
DeleteGreat article! There's been a lot of discussion about spy organizations during the Regency -- whether they officially existed or not. Clearly there was a precedent in England for such. And who can forget John Andre and Benedict Arnold from the American Revolution? Great post, Katherine.
ReplyDeleteWonderful write-up! So love this period, great affinity with it... Have Just published book 1 of the Royal Series...
ReplyDeleteInterestingly Elizabeth I had a superb spy network, not surprising we Brits are so good at espionage: been at it a long while. ;)
best
F
Spying in an age without CCTV cameras and recording devices is an intriguing idea. It must have been an art form in itself, transferring sensitive information from person A to person B - I suppose if you werent intercepted transferring it, then there wouldnt have been a trail such as there is today, to catch you after the event.
ReplyDeleteGrace x