Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Colour my tableware Bristol Blue

by Mike Rendell

The City of Bristol, lying a hundred miles to the west of London, has been famous for many things over the centuries. In the Middle Ages it was a significant port, and the city was second in size and importance only to London. It was from Bristol that the explorer John Cabot sailed off on board The Mathew, returning later with the news that he had discovered “new found land” (Newfoundland, now part of Canada). Later, in the Victorian era it became irretrievably linked with the import of tobacco (the huge bonded warehouses still remain) and with the activities of Isambard Kingdom Brunel (Clifton Suspension Bridge, the Great Western Railway and the SS Great Britain). But in the 18th Century the city was famous for something totally different: the manufacture of glass. Indeed the city gave its name to a particular type of glass – Bristol Blue – although much of the blue glassware was actually made elsewhere, and Bristol itself produced vast quantities of clear glass (used in bottles, windows etc.) as well as the brilliantly coloured rich blue glass used in decorative tableware.

How did this come about? There are records to show that small quantities of blue glass medicine bottles were being manufactured in Bristol in the middle of the seventeenth century. The underlying glass-making skills flourished due to a huge local demand: the fine new houses in the city and in nearby Bath all needed large quantities of glazing. Indeed it has been estimated that over fifty per cent of all glass used in England in the 18th Century was produced in Bristol (to say nothing of the glass exported to the colonies). Added to this was the demand for bottles to cope with the burgeoning wine trade. Harveys and Averys were both wine shippers based in Bristol with their roots in the 1790s.

At some stage the manufacturing process received a huge boost with the (English) invention of the conical chimney, enabling noxious gasses from the furnaces to be drawn upwards and out into the atmosphere. Coal needed to fire the furnaces was readily available – it was mined in many areas around the city. The choking and often dangerous conditions in which the men worked started to improve and the cone-shaped kilns started appearing all over the city – at one stage there may have been as many as sixty, and a commentator at the time remarked that in Bristol there were as many glass chimneys as church spires. Only one chimney remains (or at least in part) as The Kiln Restaurant in what used to be the Ladbroke Dragonara hotel near St Mary Redcliffe. I believe it is now known as The Ramada Bristol City but for all I know it will soon be re-designated as the Hilton Sheraton Hyatt Holiday Inn….

Churning out window glass and bottle glass established the skill and manufacturing base, and it was from this base that the next phase took off: the manufacture of lead crystal (then known as Flint Glass). The process had been invented by the chemist George Ravenscroft in the 1670’s. He discovered that adding lead gave the glass a harder, more brilliant, finish - one which could be engraved to give a sharp image. Lead was available from the nearby Mendip hills, where it had been extracted since Roman times. For a time factories had to choose between making either window glass or Flint Glass – they were prohibited from combining the two because up until 1845 Flint Glass was taxed at a much higher rate. Excise Men toured the factories to make sure that no Flint Glass was produced unless the tax was paid. One effect of this was to make it more logical for the Flint Glass to move “up-market” with smaller factories producing high class products. This in turn meant links were established between the glass manufacturers and the skilled craftsmen needed to engrave and decorate the glassware.

It is at this juncture that two men appeared on the scene to transform the City’s glass-making reputation. The first was the Bristol merchant and potter named Richard Champion. He used the glass-making technology to develop a recipe for making porcelain. This he patented and then approached the chemist William Cookworthy – he wanted a way of emulating the blue-on-white porcelain of the Far East. Cookworthy knew of the cobalt oxide, known as smalt, which was being mined at the Royal Saxon Cobalt Works in Saxony. When production ceased in around 1753 Cookworthy bought the exclusive rights to all remaining smalt stocks, and over the next twenty years they were brought into England by ship into just one port – Bristol.

And so it was that the Flint-glass makers of Bristol suddenly found themselves with easy access to the mineral which they could mix with the lead glass to make a beautiful soft-blue material. Other glass makers in other cities had to buy the cobalt from Cookworthy in Bristol and this helped give rise to its name – Bristol Blue.

Into this scene entered a man who had no previous background in glass making, one Lazarus Jacob. He was from a Jewish family and had come to England from Frankfurt in Germany around the middle of the century; he was a wheeler-dealer selling linen and bankruptcy stock. It looks as though he married outside the faith (and quite possibly into a local glass making family) and by the 1760s had established glassworks in Temple Street Bristol. The first reference to him in the Bristol Journal is in February 1771 when Lazarus is described as a “glass cutter opposite Temple Church”. Lazarus died in 1791 but the business was taken over by his son Isaac Jacob, who in 1805 advertised his newly completed “Non Such Flint Glass manufactory”. Trade boomed phenomenally as demand for this luxury tableware soared – George III was one of his patrons. With the Royal Warrant came fame and, for a while, fortune. And what made the Jacobs family famous - and uniquely popular with collectors today – is that they introduced the idea of signing each piece individually. This had never been done before.



For perhaps thirty years decorating your table with Bristol blue glass was de rigeur – blue decanters for cognac, rum and gin; blue cruet sets; blue coolers (holding iced water, with drinking glasses suspended round the edge so that the bowl of each glass was kept chilled); blue finger-rising bowls beautifully decorated with gold Greek key motifs; and blue wine glasses.
In time Isaac over-expanded the business. It is not clear whether the import of smalt ceased because of the Napoleonic Wars or because supplies became exhausted. But cease they did. Added to this Isaac had made some disastrous business loans - friends defaulted and left him with huge liabilities. At the same time he had started work on building a huge house at great expense at nearby Weston Super Mare. Up until then Weston was little more than a fishing village on the mud banks of the River Severn, but it had started to become a popular resort and Isaac was determined that his house, Belvedere, would impress. In practice he was forced to sell it as soon as it was finished, but his creditors were circling and he was declared bankrupt shortly afterwards. He died a broken man in 1835.

Nowadays Bristol blue is eminently collectable. Two modern companies make replicas, while a museum containing the most amazing collection of Bristol Blue is located at the Bristol Blue Glass South West Glass Museum at Whitehouse Lane, St. Catherine's, Bedminster, (South Bristol).
You can find their website here  and I am grateful to them for the use of the images used throughout this post.




Mike's book on life in the Eighteenth Century entitled 'The Journal of a Georgian Gentleman' is available on Kindle. He also has a paperback version available via Amazon

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Knights Templar Organizational Structure - Scott Higginbotham


Red Cross Pattée Image by Scott Higginbotham

Like any well-oiled modern military machine, the Knights Templar had a hierarchy comprised of members that served various functions. For every soldier that enters the field of battle there are support personnel that manage finances, coordinate shipments of material and troops, and then there are those that perform clerical duties.

Alas, not every member could wear the white mantle with the red cross and spur his destrier to glory nor wield a sword and lance in the thick of battle.  Some had to manage the organization, cook, or tend to the horses and their diverse needs. The lowliest grooms had to muck out stalls for certain!

At the top rung of this hierarchy was the Grand Master – a title which evokes those comical images of older men wearing strange hats with tassels. However, the Grand Master was a lofty position that came with great responsibility. One had to have risen through the ranks and proven himself in battle to be elected into this position. “The Grand Master in Jerusalem was in overall, autocratic charge. He was elected by a 'college' made up of 13 senior knights, representing (it is said) Jesus and his disciples.”1 The preceding quote underscores how important they believed this position was, owing to the mystical references to Jesus and the twelve disciples effectively choosing the person to fill this role.

Photo by Scott Higginbotham

The knights who wore the white mantle emblazoned with the red cross comprised about 10% of the fighting force while the rest of the members had non-military functions or duties that were less than glorious.

The ranks of this order are as follows: Knights - free men of noble birth - who wore the white mantle and red Templar cross. 

Sergeants (a rank invented by the Templars): free men of lower class who acted as men-at-arms and sentries. The sergeants wore a black or brown mantle emblazoned with the red cross.

Cleric and chaplains: the priests of the Order, who also acted as scribes and record-keepers.2

Of these general ranks there were certain titles and positions of authority that were held. Temples and preceptories scattered across Europe and the Holy Land had their own unique organizational structures that fulfilled the localized needs. There were marshals, regional commanders, provincial masters, seneschals, but space does not allow for more detailed discussion.

Photo by Scott Higginbotham

But imagine a medieval estate with its army of people ensuring smooth management and then you get an idea of the variety of faces and functions that populate the organization.  An army requires cooks, blacksmiths, grooms, armorers, priests, surgeons, and so on - the list quickly becomes endless.  Additionally, the order built fortresses and preceptories around Europe, which required craftsman to build and maintain.

Moreover, how could these men of European extraction survive and prosper they way they did without knowledge of the land, language, and customs? For this reason they employed Turcopoles, who were savvy in language and were highly aggressive warriors. “Perhaps surprisingly, the majority of the Templar army was actually made up of warriors of Arab extraction, often of mixed Arab and European blood - Turcopoles, who were familiar with the Saracens ways of warfare. For this reason the Order employed many Arab interpreters.”3

     
Owing to their far-reaching military and organizational structure and the fact that the Knights Templar rendered allegiance solely to the pope, they effectively were a country operating within and without borders.  The idea of this group operating as a "fifth column" does not seem so far-fetched, thus making them ripe for all manner of speculation concerning their true mission. So are the conspiracies and the games and books they spawned true? Scott Higginbotham is the author of A Soul’s Ransom, a novel set in the fourteenth century where William de Courtenay’s mettle is tested, weighed, and refined, and For A Thousand Generations, where Edward Leaver navigates a world where his purpose is defined with an eye to the future.


 
 

Temple of Mysteries (2010-12-01). The Knights Templar (Kindle Locations 599-600). Temple of Mysteries. Kindle Edition.1
Temple of Mysteries (2010-12-01). The Knights Templar (Kindle Locations 601-606). Temple of Mysteries. Kindle Edition.2
Temple of Mysteries (2010-12-01). The Knights Templar (Kindle Locations 607-609). Temple of Mysteries. Kindle Edition.3

Monday, January 7, 2013

Falling in Love with an Older Woman (350 years Older)



“I Bridget Hodgson of the City of York, Midwife”
Though I could not have known it at the time, these words – found in a 1683 will – changed my life. I first read these words while a graduate student digging through the archives in York, England, and on that spring day I fell in love with an older woman. Even to this day, I struggle to explain my devotion, but I want to try again.

In truth, Bridget had me at “midwife” because in 1683, women were widows, wives, or spinsters. They were identified by who they married not what they did. Yet here she was, saying “I’m a midwife! Get over it!” What kind of woman does this? I wondered. And while the hook was set, Bridget had only just begun to win my heart.

When she wrote her will, Bridget’s first concern was that her funeral reflected her status, and once again, she amazed: “I do direct that Sir John Hewley, Sir Henry Thompson, Sir Stephen Thompson, George Pricket Esq., Edward Thompson, Alderman, Robert Waller, Alderman, William Breary Doctor of Laws, and Thomas Fairfax Esq., be invited to carry me to my grave.” Wait, I thought. She wants knights, lawyers and aldermen (and Lord-Mayors and Members of Parliament, I later learned) to serve as her pallbearers? Who is this woman?

“And I give unto the heralds painter who shall order my funeral and make my escutcheons a mourning ring, and I desire Christopher Harrison may do the work.” Wait, what? Herald’s painter? Escutcheons? (Runs to dictionary.) She’s having someone paint her coat of arms, which means she’s a Gentlewoman. I love her, but will I have to call her “Lady Bridget” from now on?

I’d only known this woman for a few paragraphs, but already I knew that she was a midwife, politically well-connected, and a member of England’s hereditary gentry. This was an unusual woman, but there was much more to come. It turns out that she was quite rich, for at a time when a laborer might earn fifteen pounds per year, she had loaned hundreds of pounds to her friends, and given her daughter “my coral necklace and bracelets, my large ring with two and twenty stones… and also a sealed ring of gold with my late husband’s coat of arms and my own engraven on the same.”

I know what you are thinking. I only loved Bridget for her money. And I can’t say that it didn’t intrigue me, but I really did love her for her personality, and this became clear when she listed her godchildren, who – as godmother – she had the privilege of naming: “I give unto the several persons…for whom I was Godmother ten shillings apiece, to wit: Bridget Swain, Bridget Ascough, Bridget Morris, Bridget Wilberfoss, Thomas Robinson, Edward Watson, and Thomas Horsley.” It’s one thing to give your name to your own child, but who gives their name to other people’s kids? Bridget Hodgson, the most awesome midwife ever, that’s who. Oh, she also named her daughter Bridget, so by the end of her life, she could have fielded an All-Bridget basketball team.

So when I sat down to write a novel about a crime-solving, butt-kicking midwife, could there be any question who my model would be? I made a few changes, of course, cutting out a few of her children (who has time to solve crimes and raise a family?), but throughout The Midwife’s Tale I have tried to remain true to the woman I love, and I can only hope the historical Bridget would see something of herself in the portrait I have painted. 

Want to win a copy of The Midwife's Tale? Leave a comment below, and your name will be entered in a drawing! 
-----
You can order The Midwife's Tale from major vendors, from Amazon to Walrmart by going to my publisher's website . If you'd rather purchase a signed copy, or would like to support a great independent bookstore, you can order a copy from Mac's Backs on Coventry.

Ruthless villains and feisty heroines - The Gilded Lily

Every week someone offers a book for nothing and this week it's my turn!
You can read about the book HERE. You will be prompted to return here to enter the drawing, and be sure to leave your contact information.
Ends at midnight, January 13th.

Good luck everyone!

Aesop's Fables and the Bayeux Tapestry


By Rosanne E. Lortz
A Crow having stolen a bit of cheese, perched in a tree and held it in her beak. A Fox, seeing this, longed to possess the cheese himself, and by a wily stratagem succeeded. "How handsome is the Crow," he exclaimed, in the beauty of her shape and in the fairness of her complexion! Oh, if her voice were only equal to her beauty, she would deservedly be considered the Queen of Birds!" This he said deceitfully; but the Crow, anxious to refute the reflection cast upon her voice, set up a loud caw and dropped the cheese. The Fox quickly picked it up, and thus addressed the Crow: "My good Crow, your voice is right enough, but your wit is wanting.”  
This fable, attributed to the Ancient Greek slave Aesop, appears pictorially three different times in the margins of the Bayeux Tapestry. Other fables, also from Aesop, show up as well, leading historians to pose an interesting question: Why were they included? Are they merely decoration? Or are they commentary on the larger narrative of the Tapestry itself?

The Bayeux Tapestry is an embroidered cloth over 70 meters long that tells the story of the Norman Conquest of England. The Tapestry begins with the depiction of Harold Godwinson, Earl of Wessex, journeying to Normandy. There he is taken captive by the Normans and brought to Duke William, to whom he swears some kind of oath, most probably an oath pledging his support to William in the matter of the English succession. The Tapestry goes on to show Harold sailing back to England and becoming king himself after Edward the Confessor’s death. Duke William then launches an invasion, defeats and kills Harold, and takes the crown.

"Where Harold made an oath to Duke William"

The origins of the Bayeux Tapestry are debated by historians. Most agree that it was commissioned by a Norman in the decades following the Conquest (since it seems to tell the version of events as given by Norman historians like William of Poitiers and William of Jumieges). But the jury is out on whether it was commissioned by the Conqueror’s wife Matilda, the Conqueror’s brother Odo, or someone else entirely. There is also healthy discussion on whether it was created in the French town of Bayeux or embroidered somewhere in England.

One segment of thought believes that the Tapestry, although commissioned by a Norman, was embroidered by the conquered Anglo-Saxons, and thus has a subversive subtext stitched into its borders. The fables and their interpretation play a key part in this fascinating theory. While I do not have time to look at each fable in depth, I want to show you how the embroiderers’ use of “The Fox and the Crow” bears out this idea of an Anglo-Saxon subtext rebelliously commenting on the larger narrative. 

In the story of “The Fox and the Crow”, we see a strong animal taking advantage of a weak one. The fox uses guile to trick the foolish crow into giving up the coveted piece of cheese. The moral of the fable, “Flatterers are not to be trusted,” leads the reader to identify with the unfortunate crow as the hero of the story. The Fox, although clever, is still the villain of the piece. The cheese was never rightfully his—it was something that he stole through deceit. 


First Appearance of "The Fox and the Crow"

There are several pictorial clues in the Tapestry linking the Crow to Harold and the Fox to William. The first time the fable appears, it is beneath the scene where Harold is setting sail for Normandy. The Crow is on the left, and the Fox on the right. If the Crow is symbolizing Harold, then this is exactly what we would expect since in the historical narrative Harold is leaving England on the left, journeying toward Normandy and William on the right. 

The cheese has already dropped from the Crow’s mouth and is halfway between the Crow and the Fox. What does this indicate? Perhaps that Harold, just by setting sail has as good as lost the prize. Or perhaps it is a foreshadowing of what is to come. 


The Second Appearance of "The Fox and the Crow"

The second instance of this fable occurs after Harold has been captured by Guy of Ponthieu and brought to William. It is shown beneath the scene where Harold is accompanying William to the Breton war. In this picture of the fable, the cheese is already in the Fox’s mouth.  Harold, now in William’s clutches, has already lost the prize. 


The Third Appearance of "The Fox and the Crow"

The third instance of the fable comes in the upper margin just as Harold has left Normandy to return to England. The arrangement of the Fox and the Crow in this third version of the fable is interesting. The Fox (which we have already established as William) is on the left, in the direction of the Normandy that Harold has just left. The Crow is on the right, in the direction of Harold’s voyage. The historian David Bernstein notes that the Fox and the Crow are “no longer in the same compartment.” They are “separated by a panel, a spatial composition similar to that of William and Harold below,” for Harold has just put the sea between William and himself.  

In a strange twist, the Crow now has the cheese in her mouth. You will recall that in the two previous showings of this fable, the cheese was either in midair, or firmly in the clutches of the Fox. Escaping from Normandy unscathed, Harold has regained his prize for a time by putting a watery barrier between William and himself. 

Throughout this story, the cheese in question is a symbol of the throne of England. Harold has it. William wants it. And somehow, through trickery, William will contrive to get it. Harold may have been as foolish as the flattered bird to travel to Normandy in the first place, but it is only because William is as rapacious and guileful as a Fox that Harold’s cheese is in any danger. (See my earlier post on what William was like Before He Was the Conqueror).

The clever use of Aesop’s Fables in the Bayeux Tapestry—of which “The Fox and the Crow” is just one example—provides us with an even greater appreciation for the makers of the Tapestry. Were they members of the oppressed Anglo-Saxon race, trying to hint at their own perception of events, even while they stitched out the story their conquerors demanded? The use of the Fables hints that such a subtext could be possible, and though the evidence might not be enough to make an unqualified historical claim, it could be enough to inspire the story for another historical novel. 

I've noticed that a couple novels have been released recently featuring the Bayeux Tapestry. I haven't had the chance to read them yet, but when I do, I'm curious to find out if Aesop's Fables get a mention....


_________________

Rosanne E. Lortz is the author of I Serve: A Novel of the Black Prince, a historical adventure/romance set during the Hundred Years' War, and Road from the West: Book I of the Chronicles of Tancred, the beginning of a trilogy which takes place during the First Crusade.

You can learn more about Rosanne's books at her Official Author Website where she also blogs about writing, mothering, and things historical.

_________________

BIBLIOGRAPHY


Aesop’s Fables.  Trans. Rev. George Fyler Townsend [on-line collection]. Available from http://www.pacificnet.net/~johnr/aesop/. 

Bernstein, David J. The Mystery of the Bayeux Tapestry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

Bridgeford, Andrew. 1066: The Hidden History of the Bayeux Tapestry. London: Harper Perennial, 2004.

Wilson, David M. The Bayeux Tapestry. New York: Thames & Hudson, Inc. 1985.





Saturday, January 5, 2013

Royalist Rebel, the story of Elizabeth Murray

by Anita Seymour


Whilst searching for a strong female protagonist from the 17th Century on whom to base my latest novel, I discovered one practically on my own doorstep. At the time I lived around the corner to Ham House, a stunning red brick Jacobean mansion on the River Thames, the home of Elizabeth Murray, Lady Dysart and Duchess of Lauderdale. Her second husband, John Maitland, Duke of Lauderdale, was one of Charles II’s Cabal ministry and between he and Elizabeth, turned Ham into a palace fit for their king.

Bishop Burnet, described by Elizabeth’s biographer, Doreen Cripps as ‘that spiteful old busybody’, left a sketch of her character coloured with his prejudice and personal malice.

She was a woman of great beauty, but of far greater parts. She had a wonderful quickness of apprehension, and an amazing vivacity in conversation. She had studied not only divinity and history, but mathematics and philosophy. She was violent in every thing she set about, a violent friend, but a much more violent enemy. She had a restless ambition, lived at a vast expense, and was ravenously covetous; and would have stuck at nothing by which she might compass her ends. She had blemishes of another kind, which she seemed to despise, and to take little care of the decencies of her sex.

Elizabeth's mother, Catherine Bruce Murray, took seventeen-year-old Elizabeth and her three younger sisters to the exiled Court at Oxford during the winter of 1643/1644, where Charles I had fled after the Battle of Edgehill, where they most likely saw first hand how difficult life had become for many followers of the king.

Catherine Bruce Murray

Elizabeth’s father, William Murray, Earl Dysart, a Gentleman of the Bedchamber to King Charles I and one of his closest friends, was once his ‘whipping boy’, and received chastisement for the young royal. Murray was Charles I’s envoy and made many dangerous trips across country and the continent for his master.

On his return to England in February 1646 he was seized as a spy in Canterbury and sent to the Tower of London, where he remained through the summer. With the help of the Scottish Lords, amongst them Earl Lauderdale, he was released on condition he did all in his power to induce his master to yield to the conditions of the Parliament. [And we all know well how that turned out!]

Parliament decided Murray, who had Scots Covenanter relatives, was a bad influence on the king and banished him to Queen Henrietta Maria’s court outside Paris. Despite this dangerous disgrace, Elizabeth’s formidable mother, Catherine Bruce Murray, allegedly invited Cromwell to dine at Ham House when King Charles I was under house arrest at Hampton Court, five miles downriver.

The young Elizabeth charmed Oliver Cromwell with her wit and intelligence, and they remained in contact, even through King Charles II’s exile in the 1650’s, when Elizabeth was reputedly a member of The Sealed Knot carrying money and information to the exiled king.

That meeting between the Royalist girl and the Lord General of the Roundhead army must have been a difficult one, for several attempts had been made by the Surrey Sequestration Committee to seize Ham House and the family's estate, threatening to leave them all homeless.

Cromwell was well known to despise Earl Lauderdale, and when he was captured after the Battle of Worcester in 1651, it was a tribute to Elizabeth's diplomacy, that when she pleaded for mercy for Lauderdale, Cromwell commuted his sentence to imprisonment.

Elizabeth married Sir Lionel Tollemache 2nd Bart when she was twenty-one, a non political Suffolk landowner who attracted neither Royalist or Parliamentary attention. The marriage was a successful one, and secured Ham House for Elizabeth and her three sisters, and she bore him eleven children in twenty-two years, five of whom lived to adulthood. Elizabeth maintained contact with Earl Lauderdale, who spent seven years in prison, and when Lionel died in 1669, Lady Mary Lauderdale went to Paris, apparently to distance herself from the burgeoning friendship between her husband and Elizabeth.

Mary died in 1672 and six weeks later, to the outrage of London society, John Maitland, Earl of Lauderdale and Lady Elizabeth Tollemache were married.

Sir Lionel and Earl Lauderdale were both early Freemasons and Ham House was the scene of many lodge meetings. It wasn’t until her forties, when Elizabeth’s political manoeuvrings as Duchess Lauderdale were frowned upon, that she was rumoured to have been not only Earl Lauderdale's mistress when they were both married to other people, but also Cromwell's mistress, suspected of spying for both sides during the Interregnum:

She is Besse of my heart, she was Besse of old Noll;
She was once Fleetwood’s Besse, now she’s Bess of Atholle;
She’s Besse of the Church, and Besse of the State,
She plots with her tail, and her lord with his pate.
With a head on one side, and a hand lifted hie,
She kills us with frowning and makes us to die.

Ham House North Front

Elizabeth died at Ham in 1698, aged seventy two, having outlived her sisters and two of her adult children.

‘Royalist Rebel’, The biographical novel of Elizabeth’s youth will be released in paperback by Claymore Books, an imprint of Pen and Sword Publishing January 17th 2013.


Friday, January 4, 2013

Print Shops - Past and Present

by Grace Elliot

In Georgian times, then as now, people were fascinated by visual images; of course, in those days there was no television or cinema and so art was the draw. However only those with spare income could afford the entry fee into art exhibitions, and indeed, the free, annual Royal Academy exhibition was so popular that it was mobbed by unruly crowds and eventually an entry fee was levied to keep the poorest out. But in the 18th century with the rise of the print shop, their window displays became the new galleries, drawing crowds to gaze on the latest works of art.

 

A Gillray cartoon depicting a crowd outside
a print shop in St James's Street.
Prior to 1740 most prints were imported from France and in 1744 when Hogarth engravings made for 'Marriage a la Mode' he called up two Frenchmen. Indeed, during the first half of the 18th century printsellers sold mainly French wares, the British equivalent being cheap copies and poor quality.

It took printer John Boydell to give a leg up to English engravers when he spotted a potential market amongst middle income earners, for art work to put on their walls. He commissioned prints of familiar London scenes and his business instinct was amply rewards as he made a small fortune. The public taste for prints was kept fresh by rapid developments in technique: mezzotint 1760's, aquatint 1770's and stipple in 1780's. Indeed such was their popularity that one observer, Sophie La Roche, described the wide pavement outside a print shop in Cheapside:

"[to]..enable crowds of people to stop and inspect the new exhibits."

Boydell's art was mainly classical and with the French Revolutionary wars his export trade floundered, but around the same time a new vogue arose - that of the caricature. 
Gillray's 'The Three Graces' -
an observation on the fashions of the day.
Perhaps Hogarth stimulated this new trend, with scenes depicting moral corruption, indeed James Gillray (a heavy weight in the golden age of caricature) sites Hogarth as one of his greatest inspirations. Gillray was a political satirist of genius and his work still gives the modern social historian a priceless insight into the Georgian world.

 In the late 18th century,  6d (plain) to 1s (coloured) a print would purchase a print to brighten the walls of a tavern, lodging house or workplace. Caricatures tickled the English sense of humour and quickly became all the rage, with a commensurate increase in the number of shops selling them.

James Gillray (1756 - 1815) was one of the greatest artists of this type, regularly making fun of the regent's pretensions to knowledge and the king's miserly tendances. Gillray became so influential on public perception that the king tried to suppress one of his prints (L'Assemblie Nationale) and paid a huge amount of money to buy the original plate. Gillray's publisher was a Miss Hannah Humphrey and his name was linked with hers romantically. He lived above her print shop in St James's until his death in 1815, and his print "Very Slippery Weather" shows crowds gathered around the window.

Gillray's 'L'Assemblee Nationale'.

One of Gillray's competitors, Cruikshank, records how the artist worked with prodigious speed:

 "Sometimes he would at once etch a subject on the prepared copper plate... unable even to submit to the process of drawing it upon paper... he worked furiously, without stopping to remove the burr thrown up by the [burrin]; consequently his fingers often bled from being cut by it".

The period 1789 - 1815 is widely acknowledged as the height of print influence and popularity and it was with interest that I passed this print shop on modern day, St Jame's Street. It didn't have crowds round the window but people were stopping to look at the prints, reminding me of a bygone time.
The modern day print shop -'Tottering-by-Gently' - St James's Street.
 Thank you for reading this post by Grace Elliot
If you have enjoyed it and would like to learn more about the author please visit Grace's blog:
"Fall in Love With History" http://graceelliot-author.blogspot.com
Grace's latest release is 'Hope's Betrayal."
Click for link.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Sir William Hamilton (That Hamilton Man!)


My last post for the EHFA was on Emma Hamilton, so it seems apropos that we discuss one of her other two halves, the man who is not often discussed, Sir William Hamilton.

Sir William Hamilton

January 12 1731-April 6 1803


Now, 200 years after he has died, he is more famous for whom he was married to, than his achievements in life.


PastedGraphic-2012-12-8-08-31.jpg

For 36 years he was the British Ambassador to the Kingdom of Naples. From 1764 to 1800. Turbulent times that saw the French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon.

Hamilton was also an antiquarian, an archaeologist and vulcanologist. (DWW-being Ambassador in Naples provided was access to Vesuvius and Etna.) He was a noted collector and became a member of the Royal Society. Born the fourth son of Lord Archibald Hamilton, who was Governor of Jamica, his mother was the daughter of the sixth Earl of Aberdeen. She was a mistress of the son of George II, George the Prince of Wales, who was the father of George III. George III called Sir William his foster brother.

PastedGraphic1-2012-12-8-08-31.jpg

Sir William attended the Westminster School and then was commissioned into the 3rd Foot Guards in 1747. He was promoted to Lieutenant in 1753. He married Catherine Barlow, daughter of a politician and left the army. She died in 1782, they had no children. In 1786, when he was 55 his nephew sent him a stunning young lady who had become the muse for George Romney. Sir William cancelled his nephew, Charles Greville’s debts for the introduction. Emma Lyon (Hart) captivated Sir William. They were married in 1791. He was 60 then and she was 26.

When Horatio Nelson crossed their path, a man he admired, he encouraged the notorious affair to develop. Eventually when they abandoned Naples, the three took up living all in the same houses in both Merton Place and London. Nelson refused to seek his own divorce and marry Emma until Sir William died, for they were such good friends.

PastedGraphic2-2012-12-8-08-31.jpg

William served as an MP for Midhurst in 1761 but then left to become the Ambassador to Naples. He began his collection of Greek Vases and other antiquities selling a part of his collection to the British Museum. A second collection was lost at sea when the HMS Colossus went down. What survived was purchased by Thomas Hope.

Sir William became an author Antiquités étrusques, grecques et romaines (1766–67) and Observations on Mount Vesuvius (1772). And he was a member of the Royal Society, a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries and a member of the Society of Dilettanti. He made more than 65 ascents to Mount Vesuvius and made a number of drawings before it’s eruption in 1765. He met Mozart during his tour of Italy in 1770. Goethe visited Hamilton in 1787. Goethe thought two chandeliers were most likely smuggled from Pompei, and a friend agreed telling the famed poet, that he should not pursue his investigations any further. Hamilton died in 1803 and is buried next to his first wife.



* * *


Mr. Wilkin writes Regency Historicals and Romances, Ruritanian (A great sub-genre that is fun to explore) and Edwardian Romances, Science Fiction and Fantasy works. He is the author of the very successful Pride & Prejudice continuation; Colonel Fitzwilliam’s Correspondence. He has several other novels set in Regency England including The End of the World and The Shattered Mirror. His most recent work is the humorous spoof; Jane Austen and Ghostsa story of what would happen were we to make any of these Monsters and Austen stories into a movie.

And Two Peas in a Pod, a madcap tale of identical twin brothers in Regency London who find they must impersonate each other to pursue their loves.


The links for all locations selling Mr. Wilkin's work can be found at the webpage and will point you to your favorite internet bookstore: David’s Books, and at various Internet and realworld bookstores including the iBookstoreAmazonBarnes and NobleSmashwords.



He is published by Regency Assembly Press
And he maintains his own blog called The Things That Catch My Eye where the entire Regency Lexicon has been hosted these last months as well as the current work in progress of the full Regency Timeline is being presented.

You also may follow Mr. Wilkin on Twitter at @DWWilkin
Mr. Wilkin maintains a Pinterest page with pictures and links to all the Regency Research he uncovers at Pinterest Regency-Era





Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Handel's MESSIAH: a very short and wonderful history

by Stephanie Cowell


The German composer who became an Englishman
I first heard the music of Handel's MESSIAH when I was a young soprano and was paid a few dollars to sing the soprano part of it in a humble church choir. I knew nothing about it, and when we launched into the famous Hallelujah Chorus I was astonished that everyone in the audience stood up. I thought they had had enough of our singing and were leaving, but as soon as we finished they sat down again, wherein I thought they had changed their minds. Someone subsequently told me this was a tradition begun by George II who stood up during the chorus because he was so moved but there is no real evidence that His Majesty ever attended a performance.

Handel was a German composer who moved to England in 1712 and became a British citizen in 1727. He started three opera companies in London and was immensely successful for a time. In 1723 he moved to 25 Brook Street in Mayfair (now a museum dedicated to his life and work). But by the time he had the idea to compose an oratorio based in the life of Christ, he had seen some hard times physically and financially. In 1741, having recovered from a stroke, he was sent the words or libretto of MESSIAH by Charles Jennens, a wealthy landowner who loved music and literature. Handel composed it in 22 days in a profound creative and spiritual intensity, saying that as he wrote it he felt the heavens opening and God revealed to him.(He would have said that in his thick German accent.)

original manuscript of the final chorus "Worthy is the Lamb"

It was quick to be composed and quite difficult to find first a performance for it and then an audience. As incredible as it is today, there were scandalized objections to the piece. Perhaps for that reason, Handel decided to premiere the work in Dublin but when arriving in Ireland, he found the Dean of St. Patrick's Cathedral - Jonathan Swift (known as the author of GULLIVER's TRAVELS) - attempting to block the performance of the work as irreverent and forbidding the men and boys of his cathedral choir to sing in it. Objections were somehow overcome, and it debuted in The Great Music Hall in Fishamble Street. In 1743 the work was performed in London in Covent Garden where it was pretty much a failure.

Handel had need not have despaired because as time went on, it was impossible to get a ticket when it was sung. He conducted it for the last time in 1759 very near his death and almost entirely blind. When a nobleman praised him for how wonderfully entertaining the oratorio was, Handel answered, "My Lord, I should be sorry if I only entertained them; I wished to make them better."


Handel House in Mayfair
The intimate first performance with 16 men and 16 boys singing grew to huge choruses of hundreds and hundreds. Now this oratorio is the Christmas and sometime Easter favorite of every city and church; it has been taken on by modern baroque orchestras in an attempt to recreate its original sound. I have heard it many times, often with the original chorus of all boys and men for which it was written.

Odd when you think that one of the great English oratorios of all time was composed by a German, that it almost didn't have a performance, and that so many people turned a cold shoulder to it.  Here is one of my favorite clips from YouTube: the sudden unexpected performance of the Hallelujah Chorus in a food court. I think that even if George II never stood up at this music, I would!

P.S. Handel also wrote "Zadok the Priest" which is used at coronations, at Queen Elizabeth II's Diamond Jubilee, and constantly throughout the movie THE YOUNG VICTORIA.
-----------------------------

Historical novelist Stephanie Cowell writes about English history and historic people in the arts. She is the author of Nicholas Cooke, The Physician of London, The Players: a novel of the young Shakespeare, Marrying Mozart (which debuted as an opera/play in NYC this past December) and Claude & Camille: a novel of Monet. She is the recipient of the American Book Award. Her work has been translated into nine languages. Her website is http://www.stephaniecowell.com




Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Coppinger the Dane

Coppinger is a name well known in North Devon and Cornwall, as he has become a folk legend. His name is sometimes spelt "Copinger".



He was believed to be a Danish man, the skipper and only survivor of a ship wreck off the coast of Hartland around 1792-3.  He went on to marry a local girl Dinah Hamlyn and from her parent's home began a career of smuggling and piracy with his gang of thugs.

He was reputed to be a bully and would regularly threaten to beat his wife in order to get his wife's family to do his bidding. It is no wonder then that he became known as "Cruel Coppinger".

"Will you hear of Cruel Coppinger
He came from a foreign land;
He was brought to us by the salt water,
He was carried away by the wind!"


His gang were just as bad and are said to have beheaded a revenue officer in order to scare them away from their smuggling activity on the coast in their infamous ship called Black Prince. He is also said to have controlled large areas and paths by the coast. These became known as "Coppinger's Tracks" of which one led to the edge of a 300 foot cliff. Below was a cave "Coppinger's Cave" only reachable by a rope ladder.

It is said that eventually the Revenue Officers could no longer ignore the activities of Coppinger and his men, and knowing that he could no longer continue, he escaped them in a boat and was never seen again. His final fate is unknown. "He was carried away by the wind!"

It is uncertain how much of what was written about him is real or just folklore, and it is believed that some of the things said about him were the amalgamation of two men who were active in smuggling and piracy around that time.

Of course, folk legends often become the subject of folk songs, and this one below, written by Devon folk artist Seth Lakeman is all about Coppinger and sums up much of what is said about the man. I hope you like it.


Jenna Dawlish

Jenna Dawlish is the author of two Victorian novels partly set in Devon.