Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Sabine Baring-Gould : Famous Devonshire man

Sabine Baring-Gould is a name few, if any will recognise, but he is a remarkable Victorian man who left a lasting legacy.

A clergy-man by profession, he was born in Exeter, Devon in 1834 and remained in Devon the latter half of his life. Educated at Cambridge, he lived to the age of 89.

During his life-time he was not only a clergyman but he was also a novelist and writer, folk song collector, hymn writer and scholar. He is probably most famous for writing the Christian hymn "Onward Christian Soldiers".


Author

Baring-Gould was the author of many fiction and non-fiction publications and was considered to be in the top ten authors of his time, yet few people have heard of him now and his works are little known. He wrote around 1240 different publications in his life time including ghost stories including "The book of Werewolves" and "The Bideford Witches and other stories".



His most famous non-fiction work is probably "Curious Myths of the Middle Ages." In it he details his research into many different myths such as the Holy Grail.

His most famous novel is probably Mehalah which has been compared to Wuthering Heights. He also wrote an interesting novel called "Winefred" based in the Devon seaside town of Seaton. The novel includes a fictional version of the real life smuggler Jack Rattenbury and a brilliant description of a famous land-slip that happened near Lyme Regis during his life-time.



Some of his works are available as e-books at the internet archive here.

Folk Song collector

Baring-Gould was a collector of folk songs in Devon and Cornwall and amoung English folk circles is quite famous for it. He realised that unless these songs were written down they would be lost forever. However, some of the words to some of the songs were too explicit for Victorian society so he changed them to make them more acceptable.

His book "Songs of the West: Folk songs of Devon and Cornwall" is available today here for digital download and used by many folk artists today.

Baring-Gould collaborated with another famous folk song collector Cecil Sharp to produce a number of folk song books.


Married Life

Baring-Gould married Grace Taylor the daughter of a mill hand. For her, the match would have been very advantageous and she was sent away for two years to relatives to learn middle class manners. The couple remained married for 48 years until her death, and had 15 children.

The marriage must have been successful because Baring-Gould had "Half my soul" inscribed on her tombstone.



Other interesting facts

His collection of books: Baring-Gould accumulated a large amount of books during his life and these are kept in Exeter at the stately home "Killerton House", now owned by the National Trust. The oldest is a title from the time of Henry VIII.

Baring-Gould Society: There is a Baring-Gould Society in Devon who regularly meet. There website is here.

Baring-Gould Folk Festival: Every year at the end of October in Okehampton,  Devon is the Baring-Gould Folk Festival. Details here.







Jenna Dawlish

Jenna Dawlish is the author of two Victorian novels partly set in Devon.
www.jennadawlish.com

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Why the English took to Tea - Deborah Swift

I would certainly not have been able to finish any of my books without my regular top-up of that quintessentrially English drink, tea. I have inherited a number of teapots from my mother much like these from Vintage Dorset, and tea drinking has always been a big part of my family life.

Of course tea is not really English at all, it came first from China and later was introduced to India by the British as a way of suppliying the British Empire with a cheaper product .

At the end of the 17th century almost nobody in England drank tea,  but by the end of the next century nearly everyone from King to commoner did. In 1699 six tons were imported, but by the turn of the eighteenth century eleven thousand tons were inported!


The sudden enthusiasm for tea can be attributed to a number of factors - the first of which was the King's marriage to Catherine of Braganza. Her enormous dowry, suited to her position as daughter of King John IV of Portugal, included the trading posts of Tangier and Bombay, a fortune in gold bullion, and - a large chest of tea.

Catherine loved her tea and drank it from delicate thimble-sized cups. This tea-drinking caught on like wild-fire amongst the aristocracy, leading to many ladies also demanding this new elegant drink.

Because women were excluded from coffee shops drinking tea also became sociable, particularly amongst women, and in 1717 Thomas Twining of Devereux Court, who already owned a coffee shop, opened up a tea shop to furnish women with this fashionable and popular commodity.


Tea was still so expensive that ladies could not trust their servants to buy the tea for them as it would mean entrusting them with large sums of cash. So now the ladies could take a sedan to the shop, carrying their tea caddies, which were equipped with locks to prevent pilfering. They were able to buy directly from the shop or stay a while there to meet their friends and enjoy tea freshly prepared and served in porcelain dishes.

A whole ritual then evolved as a means of demonstrating how sophisticated and cultured you were. Books and articles were written on the etiquette of serving tea, and small snacks were introduced to cleanse the palate between tastings. Great effort was made to make the dishes and plates as dainty and genteel as possible, and the food as refined. Bread and butter was the usual accompaniment, cut up very small. This later became a whole afternoon meal, our 'Afternoon Tea'.

Tea Gardens then opened up where women could meet, and also a respectable place to meet members of the opposite sex. The first to open was in Vauxhall Gardens in 1732.An article about Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens can be found here on the Museum of London Blog.

Of course none of this would have been possible without the British East India Company, which during King Charles's reign grew to become a manifestation of British power in the East Indies. The first tea imports were from Bantam (now in Indonesia) in 1669, and it was part of a cargo of pepper, silk and other textiles. As the company grew it managed to establish trading posts in China, and despite warring with the Dutch, managed to retain control over the importation of tea.

For the poor, tea became an essential once people realised that it improved health and productivity.It was healthy because of its natural anti-bacterial effects (of course this was not understood then) and the fact it was made with boiled water. It was also more suited to a labouring workforce as it was a stimulant and not like ale, likely to send you to sleep!

The story of tea is a fascinating one and I can highly recommend these books: The True History of Tea - Erling Hoh
A History of the World in Six Glasses - Tom Standage
For All the Tea In China - Sarah Rose


And my new book THE GILDED LILY- during the writing of which I must have drunk hundreds if not thousands of cups of tea -  is released in the US tomorrow!



A fast-paced adventure peopled with ruthless villains and feisty heroines whose exploits grab the imagination and add suspense and excitement to a historical gem Lancashire Evening Post

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Falling in love with England and its history

by Stephanie Cowell

A part of the old London wall
It began when I was very young; I felt I did not belong in New York City where I was born but somewhere across the sea in that land called England. But what was England to me? Any place
for which we long is formed from fragments which mysteriously arrive and become part of us.

My first sense of England was literature, of course: Sara Crewe in A Little Princess and Mary Lennox in The Secret Garden in beautifully illustrated editions. I read them until the words almost wore away. I was Sara coming from her attic to be discovered at last to be the little girl everyone had been looking for. I was Mary exploring the deserted rooms of the manor house on the moors. In my early teens it was the poetry (all of Shakespeare) and the great Victorian novels. I told myself, “That is where I belong; that is where I must be.” England had formed in my mind as the place where I could find my true self.

I painted a picture of “this earth, this realm, this England,” as Shakespeare calls it. It was a mixture of lovers running over the moors, a beautiful young queen, London attics, hot milky tea and servants always on hand to make it, and a great mysterious line of kings described as “the Unready” or “the Confessor” and queens who always looked ready to have their portraits painted and who each possessed a far more glamorous wardrobe than that within my schoolgirl closet; tombstones, ancient churches, an orderly way or being and doing things. (I was looking for the orderly; I passed by Henry VIII and his disorderly coterie of marriages. I am glad others felt differently! What would we do without Anne Boleyn?)


Temple Bar, City of London
And so I saved and saved and finally went to England and the England I expected was waiting for me. I walked all over London. I visited the Tower on an overcast day when it was not crowded and was properly awed by the tiny rooms and thick walls. Still, the heart of my England was literature not royalty even though I love the stability and ceremony of a monarch, a world in which everyone had their place. I looked for writers: the new Globe had not been built, but I walked where Shakespeare had walked and found the old streets he had known: Cheapside, Love Lane. I visited Dickens’ House. I found and touched what was left of the London City Walls.

I went to Haworth and walked in the parlor where Charlotte Bronte had walked with her sisters. I climbed about the moors and heard the wind wuthering. I went to Oxford where my great heroes had studied and heard the choirboys sing in the little cathedral as they had done for hundreds of years. I longed for medieval houses, for London fog, for wonderful names of villages. (I shall not forget my first bus ride to Yorkshire and passing the signs for the town of Giggleswick.)

I was looking for something that I felt had been waiting for me. I believe it was.

My husband has come with me as I visited the places I love. When we stand in the old city though he sees the tall financial buildings and I see the long-gone half-timbered houses. Upon taking a tour bus I became increasingly emotional at every sight and when we finally passed Temple Bar where Fleet Street, City of London, becomes the Strand, Westminster, and where the City of London traditionally erected a barrier to regulate trade into the city (and traditionally the Lord Mayor of London must meet and allow entry to the monarch), I burst into a flood of tears. My husband was patient, comforting and bewildered; he has often repeated this story to friends of how his wife could cry because someone walked a street in London three hundred years ago.

All of us who write on this blog or read it are English or have longed for England so intensely that we have made it a major part of our creative and emotional lives. Its present and past are rooted in us in a way we cannot fully explain; it calls to each of us in a slightly different way. How has it called you and for what reasons?

"This royal throne of kings, this sceptered isle…
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea…
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England."
-- Richard II (Shakespeare)


Anne Hathaway's Cottage
About the author: Historical novelist Stephanie Cowell is the author of Nicholas Cooke, The Physician of London, The Players: a novel of the young Shakespeare, Marrying Mozart and Claude & Camille: a novel of Monet. She is the recipient of the American Book Award. Her work has been translated into nine languages. Her website is http://www.stephaniecowell.com

Friday, November 23, 2012

Glencoe, a Highland Novel by Shawn Lamb

Shawn Lamb is giving away two copies of Glencoe- an ecopy for international readers and a paperback in the US. This giveaway ends at midnight, Sunday Nov. 25th. To see some information about the book, please click HERE. Comment on this post to enter the drawing, and be sure to leave your contact information.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Tambour Work

by Lauren Gilbert



Madame de Pompadour at her Tambour Frame by Henri Drouais
 
Regency novels frequently refer to “tambour frames” and “tambour work”.  One novel contained an amusing story where a lady used a tambour frame as a weapon.   I assumed It was a form of embroidery but knew nothing about it.   I enjoy needlework and thought it would be interesting to see what it was.
Tambour embroidery was a very popular and fashionable craft.   Thought to have originated in China, it was supposedly introduced to France in the mid-18th century, and subsequently spread to England and western Europe.   Ladies occupied their time with tambour work as well as other needle crafts, while professionals used this technique on a larger scale until machines were able to produce similar effects.  The stitcher uses a needle with a hook, similar to a modern latch hook, and makes a chain stitch on fabric stretched in a round frame. 
The frame is a two-part object, with an inner frame over which the fabric is stretched with the exterior frame holding it in place.  It is called a tambour or tambour frame because it resembles a drum (“tambour” is French for drum).  It is similar to modern embroidery hoops, but much heavier.   (I can now see how it could actually do some damage if used to strike someone!)  The thread is held underneath with one hand, while the other hand pushes the hooked needle through the fabric to catch the thread and pull it through. 

This shows the position of the hands, and the sturdiness of the frame.

Bringing the thread back up through the same hole forms a loop, and the pattern evolves as each new stitch is formed near the previous stitch, catching the loop from that stitch.  The stitches form a continuous chain.  The hooks used were small, sometimes not much more than a wire bent at the tip, and produced a lacy design.   It was commonly used to produce white on white design, such as the flower and vine designs popular on white muslin.  Tambour work was used to embroider gowns, shawls, reticules and other wearable items.  Using the finest hooks and threads, the chain stitch would also lend itself to monogramming handkerchiefs.  Obviously, fabrics with a more open weave such as muslin, gauze and net lend themselves beautifully to tambour work, as can be seen in the illustration below: 

At Fontenoy Chateau

Tambour embroidery is now also referred to as tambour crochet.  Crochet work as we know it seems to have evolved from tambour embroidery at least in part, being worked as a continuous chain, using a hook and thread or yarn, without the background fabric.  Tambour embroidery is still done today.  There are numerous resources on the internet for supplies, hooks and frames, and videos of instruction.
References:
de Dillmont, Therese.  THE COMPLETE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF NEEDLEWORK.  Third edition.  1996: Running Press, Philadelphia, PA.  (Illustrations of the tambour hook (fig. 280), and the position of the hands with the frame (fig. 281) from p. 144 used with permission.)
The Embroidery Site.  BellaOnline.com.   “Tambour Work” by Megan McConnell.  Not dated.  http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art67103.asp
Clan Iain Abrach~McClain blog.  “A Brief History of Crochet” by Catie Rua the Weaver.  Posted 11/1/2003. http://www.iainabrach.org/blogitem.asp?ID=6  
Design.Decoration.Craft blog.  “Tambour Emboridery Work.”  (no author shown.) Posted 7/22/2010. http://thetextileblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/tambour-embroidery-work.html  
Illustrations of Madame de Pompadour and the Fontenoy tambour frame are from WikiCommons.  

Lauren Gilbert is the author of  HEYERWOOD: A Novel.  The heroine, Catherine, is a skilled needlewoman.  (More about the novel at http://www.heyerwood.com )
 

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Fleet Prison-London

By Katherine Pym
Fleet Prison was around since the time of William the Conqueror. The term Fleet comes from Saxon times which loosely means ‘a large enough stream to navigate’. Records show it could handle a dozen ships loaded with merchandise, and barges of considerable size and weight. The tide flowed as high as Holborn Bridge. At low tide, the water was still at least five feet deep. 

Fleet Ditch
Throughout the years, the Fleet river became fouled with all manner of excrement and garbage. In 1606, the Lord Mayor and Aldermen demanded it be cleaned. Eventually, it disappeared with an open thoroughfare over it, called Farringdon Street.

From the Doomsday survey, the Fleet Prison was held in conjunction with the See of Canterbury and the English Crown. Between the kings and archbishops, the wardenship of the prison passed down from one knight to another beginning with the family of Leveland in County of Kent. For over one hundred years, this family held custody of the king’s palace in Westminster and Fleet Prison, and any monies these garnered.

Custody of the Fleet could be bought for high prices. In 1594, it was held by Sir Robert Tyrrel, Knight, who sold it to Sir Henry Lello for the considerable amount of £11,000.

From the 15th through mid 17th centuries, the Fleet was called the prison of the Star Chamber, or Court of the Privy Council wherein the inhabitants were of the upper crust--political and religious dissidents. After being judged by those of the Star Chamber they were thrust in the Fleet. Sir Walter Raleigh, charged with treason, resided there for a time. The Star Chamber had supreme jurisdiction of the Crown. It stood by itself. No other courts could challenge the Star Chamber. The Privy Counselors sent the higher people of the land to the Fleet without appeal. There were no juries and no witnesses. They could inflict heavier punishments than any other court.

This was abolished by an act of parliament in July 1641. After this, the Fleet became a debtor’s prison. It was also a paying prison. There were no freebies there. The prisoner paid for everything. He’d pay for his food and lodgings, pay for the guard to turn the key to his cell. He’d pay for putting on and removal of his shackles. The warden and his officers received monies for all things in Fleet Prison. A debtor could leave the prison for a day or so, only if the family paid the guard a day’s wages to compensate for loss of monies garnered through fees.

The warden received 20d per day from every man in the prison. Some wardens abused their power. During the reign of Charles II, a warden named Mr. John Huggins allowed several persons to escape from the Fleet. One fellow, who owed more than £10,000 was allowed to travel to France to conduct his affairs. The warden extorted money from folk as they fled the prison. His superiors declared him guilty of ‘notorious breaches of trust’.

The amount of monies depended on who the prisoner was. For instance, during the reign of Elizabeth I while still the prison of the Star Chamber, an Archbishop, Duke or Duchess were to pay £21, 10s, and zero pence for a week’s worth of food. They also paid for anything beyond normal, such as wine: £3, 6s, 8d. A yeoman paid for his weekly fare £1, 14s, 4d. If he wanted wine, it was another 5s. A poor man had no food. If he could pay for weekly fare, it would cost him 7s, 4d.

The poor devil who couldn’t pay was allowed a moment at grilled door that looked out on the street. There he begged for a coin or two. This beggar would not be allowed in the upper floors with the more well-to-do, but in the cellar, or Bartholomew Fair. These people generally died quickly from ‘Gaol Fever’.

Mid 17th and into the 18th century the Fleet became notorious for its Fleet marriages. Fifty to sixty couples were married per week in the Fleet ‘Chapel’ by ministers in prison for debt. The marriage shop in Fleet became big business, and for a fee, with no questions asked, couples were married. These weren’t children marrying, either. The average age for men and women marrying during the 17th century were in the mid to late twenties.
Marriage paperwork was almost nonexistent. Clergy in prison for debt hid behind the walls to keep from being fined for these marriages. If caught, they would be fined £100. If not caught, these clergy could amass piles of money in this business.

Around 1710-1753, these marriages expanded to a sanctuary area outside the prison, where clergy imprisoned for debt could make a living. This gave the clergy freedom to marry customers day or night. The certificates issued looked official, mostly stamped paper. For a fee, false entries of marriages were entered in registers. If the bride was pregnant, the entries could be backdated. Witnesses afterward were not easy to find.

This all ended with the Marriage Act of 1753.

For more information on the chaos of marriage during the 17th century, please see Viola, A Woeful Tale of Marriage, set in London 1660. http://www.amazon.com/Katherine-Pym/e/B004GILIAS

For the information in this blog, I am grateful for the following resources:
  • Uncertain Unions, Marriage in England 1660-1753, by Lawrence Stone
  • The Fleet, A brief Account of the ANCIENT PRISON CALLED “THE FLEET”, IN THE CITY OF LONDON, Abolished by Act of Parliament, 1842 etc.
  • London, The Biography, by Peter Ackroyd

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Stone Circles:Seeking the people behind the stones

by Mark Patton

For more than thirty years, I have been actively involved in the study of Europe’s megalithic monuments. From passage graves such as Maes Howe in Orkney, and Newgrange in Ireland; to the long barrows and stone circles of the Cotswolds; the standing stones of Brittany; and the stone temples of Malta, guide books and museum displays tell us that these structures were built between seven thousand and four thousand years ago, by Neolithic farmers who grew wheat and barley; kept cattle, sheep and pigs; and used pottery; but who had no knowledge of either metals or writing. Generally, the monuments themselves are assumed to have played some role in the religion of these people. Some were collective tombs, others clearly were not. Some of them are aligned towards particular rising or setting points of the sun. Those built six thousand years ago did not necessarily have the same function or significance as those built four thousand years ago.

I grew up in Jersey, surrounded by these monuments. At the age of seventeen, I hitch-hiked through France, to the great stone alignments of Carnac, in Brittany. Since then, I have visited hundreds of these monuments all over Europe; spent many days in museum stores, examining, measuring and drawing the artefacts found within them; and many months directing excavations of my own. In the course of this research, I published several works of non-fiction.




The alignments of Carnac, in Brittany. Extending over 5 Km, different sections were probably built at different times, some as early as 4500 BC, others perhaps as late as 3000 BC.

The cold stones of a monument, however, and the stone tools, pottery fragments and bones found within them, can tell us only so much about the people who built the monuments, and the societies in which they lived. The great archaeologist, Christopher Hawkes, used to talk about a “ladder of inference:” it was relatively easy, he argued, to talk about prehistoric technology; rather more difficult to talk about the economics of prehistoric communities; and almost impossible to draw inferences from the archaeological evidence about the belief systems or emotional lives of prehistoric people. For my part, however, I could never stand in a stone circle, or hold a stone axe in my hand, without wanting to understand these people in fully human terms. As an archaeologist, this frequently left me perching, somewhat precariously, at the very top of Hawkes’s ladder. Ultimately, it is what inspired me to write fiction about the distant past.


Recent archaeological discoveries have shed new light on these monuments. Some megaliths in Brittany, which had been thought to have been among the earliest (carbon dated to around 4500 BC), have been shown to have been made up of the broken fragments of monuments that were earlier still. At Gobeckli Tepe, in Turkey, a stone “temple” has been found to be more than eleven thousand years old, built not by Neolithic farmers, but by Mesolithic hunters and gatherers. In England, in the area around Stonehenge (one of the most iconic, but also one of the later monuments, built around four and a half thousand years ago), archaeologists have excavated the houses and the graves of some of the people who may have built the monument. Scientific analysis of the bones shows that some of these people (the first in Britain to use metals) came from far afield: from West Wales, the origin, also, of some of the stones at Stonehenge; and, in at least one case, from Austria or Switzerland (where copper, bronze and gold were worked long before their first appearance in Britain).

The passage grave of La Table des Marchand, Brittany. Dating to around 3800 BC, the carved stone upright at the end of the chamber, and the capstone which covers it, are broken fragments of an earlier monument.

Each individual discovery is like a piece in a jig-saw puzzle, and together, they allow us to build up a picture of a dynamic society, in which some people must have travelled great distances; in which new technologies were developed in some regions, and carried to others; and in which new ideas about life and death were circulating and being debated. It is against this background that I decided to set my novel, Undreamed Shores, in which I try, for the first time, to imagine, in three dimensions, the lives of the people whose remains I have studied for so many decades.


It is both a coming of age story and an epic journey narrative. Swept off course by the tides at the end of his first trading voyage, a young man, Amzai, finds himself washed up on the shores of a land unknown to his people. Here, he struggles to master the language spoken by Nanti, the woman who has rescued him; to understand the changing society of which she and her family are part; and, ultimately, to find his way, with Nanti and her brother, back to his own homeland, opening up new contacts and trade routes as he does so. The new world into which he is drawn, however, is one riven by tensions, jealousies and rivalries, for which his upbringing in an isolated community has done little to prepare him.


Grave picture thanks to Wessex Archaeology
This grave, found near Stonehenge, has some of the earliest copper and gold objects ever found in Britain. Chemical analysis of the man’s teeth shows that he grew up in Central Europe (probably in Austria or Switzerland).

In Undreamed Shores
the character of Nanti’s father, Arthmael, is based on this discovery.


Undreamed Shores is published by Crooked Cat Publications www.crookedcatbooks.com). It can be obtained in Kindle edition from Amazon and the paperback edition has been published in October 2012. Further details can be found on my website www.mark-patton.co.uk and blog http://mark-patton.blogspot.com

Monday, November 19, 2012

The Strange Death of Richard the Lionheart

By Nancy Bilyeau

In April 1199, the French King, Philip II, thanked God for the providential death of his great rival: Richard I. Ever since the English king was freed from his prison in Austria in 1194, he had turned his war machine on the French, reclaiming the lands and castles that were taken while he was captive. Had he continued his relentless campaign, Richard might well have conquered the whole of France, and medieval history would have turned out quite differently.


Richard I
But at the age of 42, Richard died of an infection caused by an arrow wound. He was slain during a siege of a small and seemingly unimportant French castle, and certain aspects of his death struck the chroniclers of his time--and later historians--as strange, almost sordid. It was an anticlimactic end to the life of the Lionheart.

Richard was taken captive on his way back from the Third Crusade. Leopold of Austria held grudges against Richard, and he put him in a secret prison. Once Queen Eleanor, Richard's mother, discovered where her beloved son was, she appealed to the Pope. The Holy Roman Emperor set a ransom of 150,000 marks--65,000 pounds of silver. It was an astronomical sum, estimated to be three times the annual income of the English crown. But Eleanor raised it.

In the legends of Robin Hood, Richard is a benevolent ruler, who after being freed forgives his brother John and returns to the task of governing England. But Richard had little interest in England his whole life--he is rumored to have said, "If I could have found a buyer, I would have sold London itself"--and was passionate about going on Crusades or fighting for more French territory than he already possessed as the ruler of the Aquitaine.


The ruins of Chateau-Gaillard today

Richard decided what he needed was an impregnable castle from which to defend Normandy and then retake critical French land.  The vast one that he built required two years of punishing around-the-clock labor and cost an estimated £20,000, more than had been spent on any English castle in the last decade. Legend has it that while building the Chateau-Gaillard, Richard and his men were drenched with "rain of blood," but he refused to take it as an evil omen.

In March 1199, Richard was in the Limousin, suppressing a revolt by the Viscount of Limoges. He "devastated the Viscount's land with fire and sword." Then he besieged the nearby small chateau of Chalus-Chabrol. Accounts differ on why; some say it was because a peasant found treasure underground--either Roman gold or valuable objects--and Richard was so desperate for money, he lay siege to the castle. But some historians say that this entire area was of strategic importance to Richard's hold on France, and he was only there to suppress rebellion.


Ruins of Chalus-Chabrol

What most historians agree on is that Richard was walking the chateau's perimeter without wearing his chain mail and he was shot by a castle defender using a crossbow. The wound in his left shoulder turned gangrenous. It steadily grew worse over the next 10 days. Some wrote that while dying Richard asked that the bowman be brought to him. He then forgave the man, who was named Peter Basil, and instructed that he should not be harmed. Richard died in the arms of his mother on April 6th. Later, defying Richard's orders, Peter Basil was flayed alive and hanged.

Why did Richard I, a seasoned and expert warrior, expose himself to a bowman's shot? Did the king and crusader put his life at risk to claim some grubby treasure dug up from the ground--why?


Richard's tomb at the Abbey of Fontrevault

Following the custom of the time, Richard's body was buried in different places. His heart was buried at Rouen in Normandy; his entrails in Chalus; and the rest of his body near his father's remains in Anjou. A French forensics expert received permission last May to analyze a small sample of Richard I's heart to determine if the cause of the king's death was indeed septicemia, an infection of the blood. Tests results have not yet been released. When completed, they may confirm what disease killed Richard. What's harder to understand is what put him at that particular castle at that particular time so that he was killed while in his prime. There is no test for that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy Bilyeau is the author of a historical thriller trilogy. The first in the series, The Crown, examines the mystery of what killed Richard I. The Crime Writers' Association put the novel on the shortlist for the 2012 Ellis Peters Historical Dagger Award. The third in the series, The Tapestry is now on sale. To learn more, go to www.nancybilyeau.com





Sunday, November 18, 2012

The Price of Convictions

by Anna Belfrage

When I was a little girl, I devoured all kinds of historical fiction, and when the novels didn’t tell me enough I went to the history section, checking out heavy dusty tomes to further dig into what details there were. During one rather long period, I was stuck in the English Civil War, with my heart firmly in the Royalist camp.

Today, I am still stuck in the Civil War – or rather its aftermath, as I have a particular fondness for the latter half of the seventeenth century, but these days I root for the Parliamentarians. Always. A somewhat fruitless position one could argue, given that ultimately Charles II was reinstated, but there you are.

As we all know, the Restoration as such was a bloodless event. The returning king was wise enough not to demand redress for years of exile and penury, nor did he actively persecute former Parliamentarians – well, with one exception, the regicides.

Fifty-nine commissioners signed Charles I death sentence, and of these twenty were already dead when Charles II ascended the throne, nineteen were imprisoned for life, three were disinterred and executed “after the fact” so to say, and nine were hung, drawn and quartered.

The story surrounding the arrest of three of the regicides reads like a seventeenth century James Bond, starring George Downing of His Majesty’s Secret Service. (In actual fact he was the English ambassador to the Netherlands, but I prefer imagining him as a sinister guy in immaculate black velvet, rapier in hand as he trawls through the seedier parts of Delft in search of the wanted men.)

George Downing spent his childhood in England, but accompanied his family to Massachusetts when he was fifteen. He was in the first class ever to graduate from Harvard, spent some time in the West Indies and subsequently ended up as a chaplain in a regiment commanded by one John Okey.

The coming years had George seeing very much fighting first hand, and through a series of advantageous career moves plus, one must assume, considerable skills, he advanced steadily from spymaster all the way to one of Cromwell’s most trusted diplomats.

So far, George had been a steadfast supporter of the Commonwealth cause. His whole career had been built on his staunch Puritan convictions and his loyalty to the Protector. Unfortunately for George, Oliver Cromwell went and died in 1658.

Fortunately for George, at the time he was the English ambassador to the Netherlands and managed to cling on to this post throughout the eighteen months of turmoil that followed on Cromwell’s death. And while he was at it, dear George took the opportunity to mend his fences with Charles Stuart – also in the Netherlands - expressing that his life so far was a lie, built on the erroneous principles that had been inculcated in him during his years in the radical Colonies.

I’m not sure Charles bought this “volte-face”. I do, however, believe that Charles Stuart had learnt the hard way how important it was to surround himself with capable men, and George Downing was nothing if not impressively capable. A tenuous relationship was established, resulting in George still being the ambassador to the Netherlands when Charles set off to claim his throne. There were a number of people in Charles’ inner circle that were anything but thrilled by this development, and somehow George needed to quench all doubts as to where his loyalty lay. (A sarcastic person would conclude he was mostly loyal to his own interests rather than to his professed convictions …) A golden opportunity to do so arose in early spring of 1662.

After several years as a spymaster and an ambassador, George had a number of spies in his service, one of whom lived in Delft and was called Abraham Kick. How unfortunate for the three regicides, Barkstead, Corby and Okey – yupp, George’s former commanding officer – that they used Kick as their contact when fleeing the long arm of royal justice. But George, well he must have rubbed his hands together in glee at this most happy turn of events.

The Dutch were ambivalent to the new English king, and were on the whole very sympathetic to Puritans fleeing England for their land. George couldn’t risk such sensitivities getting in the way of his plan, and once he had a warrant for their arrest, he set off to do the actual arresting on his own, with people he could trust.
Night was closing in when George and his men burst into Kick’s house. I wonder what he said to Okey, if he could look these former comrades of his in the eyes when by his actions he was effectively condemning them to gruesome death. Whatever the case, he had the three regicides dragged off to Delft’s town jail and set about organising the logistics of transporting them back to England and the waiting gallows.

The people of Delft were not pleased by George’s nightly raid. The magistrates demanded that the three unfortunates should have their case tried, and public opinion was loud in their support. For a while there it seemed this most juicy plum was about to be plucked from George’s hand, but resourceful as ever he secured a handover document at lightning speed from the powers that were.


Imagine a cold March dawn in seventeenth century Delft. Mists hung like sheer veils over the network of narrow canals, and this early there were no lights, no sounds but the occasional bark of a dog. A soft splash, a muted curse, and a small boat appeared through the fog, rowed up the canal that lead to the back entrance of the jail. In the prow sat George with his precious document, and minutes later three bound men were bundled into the boat, muted screams leaking through their gags. Well before sunrise the boat had left Delft far behind and some days later Downing’s precious cargo was deposited on English soil.

In April 1662, Barkstead, Okey and Corby were hung, drawn and quartered.
In July of 1663, Downing was made a baronet, dying a couple of decades later as a very wealthy man. But now and then I suspect it came back to haunt him, that day when he arrested those three men. Did he twist in bed as he recalled Okey’s frenzied pleading that he please not do this? Did he sometimes shiver awake in the predawn, convinced that it was Okey’s hand that clutched at his neck? I somehow hope he did. He could have let them run. He chose not to.

As you may have gathered by now, I am somewhat fascinated by men with convictions. This is why my hero, Matthew Graham, is a Scots Covenanter who still holds to his vows, no matter who governs the land. At times this makes his wife, Alex, groan out loud. But what would she know of religious fortitude, how can she truly understand this man of hers when she was born in 1976? Yupp; 1976, and as Alex herself will tell you, it is all “bloody unbelievable”.

You can find more information about me and the first book in the Graham Saga, A Rip in the Veil, on my website.

Or you can go directly to Amazon and buy it there!






The Trials of Llanthony

Judith Arnopp

“In the deep vale of Ewyas, which is about an arrow-shot broad, encircled on all sides by lofty mountains, stands the church of Saint John the Baptist, covered with lead, and built of wrought stone; and, considering the nature of the place, not unhandsomely constructed, on the very spot where the humble chapel of David, the archbishop, had formerly stood decorated only with moss and ivy. A situation truly calculated for religion, and more adapted to canonical discipline, than all the monasteries of the British isle. It was founded by two hermits, in honour of the retired life, far removed from the bustle of mankind, in a solitary vale watered by the river Hodeni. From Hodeni it was called Lanhodeni, for Lan signifies an ecclesiastical place. This derivation may appear far-fetched, for the name of the place, in Welsh, is Nanthodeni. Nant signifies a running stream, from whence this place is still called by the inhabitants Landewi Nanthodeni, or the church of Saint David upon the river Hodeni. The English therefore corruptly call it Lanthoni, whereas it should either be called Nanthodeni, that is, the brook of the Hodeni, or Lanhodeni, the church upon the Hodeni.”

These are the words of Geraldus Cambrensis, describing Llanthony as it was in his day. A remote idyll set apart from the rest of the world; a place where the contemplation of God came easily.
It is still peaceful today and idyllic indeed. Yet it was the priory’s position in the Vale of Ewyas in the Black Mountains, as Geraldus describes, ‘fixed amongst a barbarous people’ that was its undoing, leaving it vulnerable to attack during the border warfare that raged between Wales and England in the 1130’s.

 The story of Llanthony is told through three chroniclers; the first an early prior named William de Wycombe; another by Gerald of Wales, archdeacon of Brecon, who crossed the Black Mountains near Llanthony in 1188; and the third by an unnamed monk of Llanthony who accounts for the years up to 1203.

It is said that while he was hunting one day the knight, William de Lacy, chanced upon a ruined chapel in a valley and, struck by its remote humility, he decided to forsake the world, and his life as a soldier and dedicate his future life to God.
Shortly afterward he was joined by Ernisius who was a chaplain to Matilda, Queen of Henry I, and together they established an Augustinian monastery. The Augustinian role was a pastoral one, taking church services and preaching locally but it was those locals that it tried to serve who began the trouble.


 In the 1130’s the Priory was engulfed by the border wars between England and Wales and due to the constant attacks, shortage of supplies and the threat of starvation, it was soon on the brink of foundering. Most of the community, at the invitation of Bishop Robert de Betun, took refuge in Hereford where they remained for two years until 1136 when a daughter house was opened in Gloucester. This foundation was known as Llanthony Secunda and soon the original monastery, now referred to as Llanthony Prima, became a retreat house and was demoted from an abbey to a priory.

Llanthony was given a new lease of life by the powerful marcher lord, Hugh de Lacy II who endowed the priory with more lands and revenues and began a lavish phase of building, the remains of which work can be seen today. Hugh’s son, another Walter de Lacy, continued the patronage and it was under his care that the church building was finally completed, becoming ‘one of the largest and finest in Wales.’

 The building of the priory church which began around 1180 and continued until 1230 became one of the great medieval buildings of Wales.  It was built in standard cruciform shape with a massive crossing tower and two smaller towers at the west end.
The east door with Norman style arch.
The earlier phase of  building in the east end is comprised of Norman style arches while the later work toward the west end, is in the taller, Gothic style. In its day the crossing tower was considerably taller than we see it today and archaeological excavation has suggested that during the late 14th century, it held a primitive type of clock to mark the hours.

The church ruins are still elegantly awe-inspiring, and even allowing for the later addition of a house and farm buildings and modern day tourists, a certain tranquillity remains.  With a little imagination it is easy to picture the priory as it once was.

And then you begin to realise that, as with most British ecclesiastical ruins, for much of the time Llanthony would have been far from tranquil. For most of its working life it would have been either a building site or under attack from locals, leaving little time for religious contemplation.

The priory’s fortunes were never stable and while local conflict continued, slowly the numbers of the brotherhood dwindled. After the rebellion of Owain Glyndwr in 1399 the Priory fell into enemy hands, entrenched in Welsh controlled lands and it continued to suffer in this manner during the wars of Henry IV in Wales.

By 1504 there were just four remaining canons in residence and, after the dissolution in the 16th century, those canons were paid off with pensions of £8 each and the site was sold and left to deteriorate.
Henry VIII granted the priory building and much of the land belonging to Llanthony to Nicholas Arnolde for the sum of £160 and it was later sold to the Harley family. In the 18th century it was bought by Colonel Wood of Brecon and the west range converted into a house.  In 1807 it was purchased by the poet, Walter Savage Landor, who landscaped the valley.

By this time the church was a ruin. The east window fell in 1800, the west window in 1803 and four piers in the south nave arcade collapsed in 1837. It was then that efforts were made to strengthen the remainder with buttresses and iron ties. The central tower was strengthened in 1936-7 and in 1951 the Ministry of Works assumed responsibility for conservation.

A visit to a once great, ruined building is always a little tinged with sadness. But a visit to a fallen religious house is sadder still, failed human aspiration is always hard to take. I prefer to go alone, not in a crowd, for in the shadows of that former world something remains of the medieval mindset.  The forgotten past echoes around the towering stone edifice, and there is nowhere better to sit for a while to contemplate, as the canons intended, the whys and wherefores of human existence.

The priory is now managed by Cadw and is free to visitors.

For more about me and my novels visit www.juditharnopp.com

Photographs property of Judith Arnopp 2012